I was flipping through the Kama Sutra yesterday and turns out to be much more than a sex manual! It’s a guide to etiquette and custom in many areas of life and offers really interesting glimpses into a culture very different from ours. Though some of it is practically timeless, for example:
The following are the kinds of friends:
- One who has played with you in the dust, i.e. in the childhood
- One who is bound by an obligation
- One who is of the same disposition and fond of the same things
- One who is a fellow student
- One who is acquainted with your secrets and faults and who’s faults and secrets are also known to you
- One who is a child of your nurse
- One who’s brought up with you
- One who is a hereditary friend
I hadn’t realized, but it’s also very Talmudic in its approach.
- Here is the rule or custom.
- The followers of X add an interpretation.
- The followers of Y disagree.
- [a digression about the theory and history of the legal principle used by the followers of Y.]
Highly recommended. The edition linked above is especially nice and uses the Richard Burton translation — I’ve also enjoyed Burton’s translation of the Arabian Nights which is a book you can dip into again and again as you please, all through your life. John Barth is a big fan of the Arabian Nights as well.
Just a brief trip five years down memory lane to revisit one of the better sentences written about me to date:
Potok’s sophomoric personal attacks against outgoing liaison Hollie Gilman may be gratuitous, but they do not detract substantively from his ideas or campaign.
I took this as a compliment, because I was only a freshman at the time! It pairs well with my recent letter to the same newspaper:
When I majored in economics at the University of Chicago, the coursework was taught with an eye towards the complexity of the outside world and an understanding that “models”—a word Golovashkina uses as an epithet—are the scientific way to best understand that complexity. A simple map does not imply a simple territory; I’d recommend Jorge Luis Borges’ “On Exactitude in Science” to anyone still confused about the usefulness of a life-sized map.
Finally, someone named Louis Potok was buying real estate in Chicago in 1922.
From my notes about John Reader’s Africa, two fascinating and poetic tidbits to go along with my two previous posts (here and here).
- Vasco da Gama, famous Portuguese explorer, would never have finished his voyage were it not for the helpful intercession of Ahmad Ibn-Madjid, “the most famous Arab pilot of his day”. However, Da Gama’s “arrival inaugurated an age of European maritime power in the [Indian Ocean] region…fellow-countrymen and co-religionists [of Ibn-Madjid] cursed his memory; and in his old age, Ibn-Madjid himself bitterly regretted what he had done.” (359)
- An earlier Portuguese voyage led by Bartolomeu Dias brought along six previously-captured African slaves to be dropped along the coastline as scouts for the location of raw materials. However, “the fate of the Africans who had been set ashore, dressed in European fashion, and bearing samples of gold, silver, and spices, is not known.” (347)
In my last post I talked about two interesting things I learned from John Reader’s Africa: A Biography of a Continent. I also mentioned that the book is sometimes infuriatingly superficial or wrongheaded in its treatment of science or economics. Let’s look at an example:
During the 16th century the Portuguese expanded their empire to include territories spread around the globe from South America to the Spice Islands of the Far East. Best estimates suggest that up to 10,000 Portuguese were working abroad at any one time. Ten thousand, when the population of Portugal was only around 1 million, and large numbers were continuously leaving to replace those who died abroad. The empire imposed a drain on manpower and resources that Portugal could not sustain–and the empire collapsed. The wonder is not that it collapsed, a history concluded, “but that it flourished for exactly a century and lasted as long as it did.” (383)
First, is ten thousand out of a million (1% of the population) really so high? For comparison, today about 10% of the population of the Philippines are working overseas. But more importantly, you should do the activity with the highest return! Reader described the Portuguese Empire as largely a series of trading missions that paid taxes on their return.
Trade flourished and the merchants prospered. It has been estimated that returns were hardly ever less than 50 per cent and sometimes as high as 800 per cent….between 1450 and 1458…the traffic yielded from five to seven times the invested capital. (339)
In an economic sense you don’t need to worry about “manpower” for other activities. What exactly was Reader worried about? If 1% of Americans went to work in Silicon Valley, the result wouldn’t be a dangerous draining of “manpower and resources” (= Labor and Capital) away from other activities. When you have prices, resources tend towards their highest-valued allocations. Saying “lots of resources went to this really high-valued activity” does not explain the collapse of an empire.